Wednesday, June 19, 2019

Cricket versus Nationalism

Gaurav Sabnis writes:
Unpopular opinion. The most overhyped, banal, and annoying "rivalry" in all sports is the India-Pakistan non-rivalry in cricket. Because it's not a sports rivalry at all. It's just a periodic proxy for people of those two countries to express their jingoism and mutual hatred.

Quite.

Frankly, I do not understand the sense of immense happiness some fans seem to experience when India plays Pakistan. When Pakistan defeated India in what in sporting terms would be called a drubbing, in the Champions Trophy in 2017, there were many expressed that they were shocked and that it was shameful the way India lost. This time, there was a video circulating of a Pakistan fan crying as they lost while blaming the Pakistan players for being fat and unfit.

As a cricket fan, I am happier when I see a great delivery or a beautiful shot, a great spell of bowling or a great innings, no matter who it is. In the match in question for example, I loved the turn Imad Wasim was able to get. Some thing Kuldeep replicated later and bowled a sharp turner ball to dismiss Babar Azam.

Yes, it is pleasing when India wins a match, however, it isn't exuberance except on rare ocassions. Winning a limited overs World Cup match certainly does not pipe my emotions. There is the whole aspect eluded to by Sabnis that we do not really share a sporting rivalry between the nations which is true. Should I establish my sense of joy and identity from this one match?

Do we become better as a nation in any which way if we defeat Pakistan, and do we become worse if we lose against them? In a sporting contest, any team can win, and would it mean all the progress India has made as a cricketing nation, or a nation, would fail, if India came out worse off on a particular day in a game versus Pakistan? Not really.

I will enjoy my cricket regardless of what every other fan tells me while abusing India or Pakistan and it's players depending upon their nationality.