Monday, March 26, 2018

Ball Tampering Explodes

Every one is up in arms against Steven Smith and his team, and rightly so. Ball tampering is cheating. Scheming to tamper the ball, as Smith admitted, is even more heinous. Reports are coming in that this is it for coach Lehmann and that Smith and Warner will get one year bans. Seems fair. The buck stops with the captain in cricket, which in this case is Steven Smith. Let me be clear, I am satisfied that he is being punished. 

Two points, I will ponder here, though. 

Firstly, why so much outrage at Australia compared to South Africa, say. It seems to me that for years, every one has been trying to get a point to bash Australia over. When finally, after years, they are caught red handed, all hell breaks loose. Harbhajan cries foul about the punishment meted out to him ages ago. Every one is raging. Finally, they get to say, 'fuck you, Australia'. This explains the reaction of the world far more than the reason given - the boorish culture which has existed under Smith, Warner and Lehmann. Else, I don't see why the cricket world would explode as it has. Is it exploding because it's cheating, or because Australia has done it and has no where to hide?

The second point is about people trying to justify this anger saying this is different from other times we have had ball tampering as usually they are impromptu events. I would like to ask those gentlemen, how did the mint used to tamper the ball suddenly come on the cricket field in earlier cases? Ideally, I would have liked to have seen Faf du Plessis also banned for a year for his actions. 

Why stop at that? Dravid was clearly seen using a cough lozenge. Why should standards be different for Dravid and Afridi compared to Smith? The Tendulkar incident makes me cringe now when I think about it. 
On the third day Tendulkar had bowled four overs of gentle medium pace but had almost immediately started swinging the ball more than any other bowler. The local TV producer instructed cameramen to zoom in on Tendulkar's hands, ostensibly to check what grip he was using. Instead, on two occasions he was spotted working on the seam of the ball with the thumb and forefinger of his left hand. The commentators went into overdrive and close-up replays were shown ad nauseam. 
In his eyrie Denness saw this and asked to be sent a copy of the recording. What he saw left him in no doubt something untoward had occurred. But lost in the maelstrom that followed was the fact that Tendulkar stood accused of not informing the umpires he was cleaning the ball under Law 42.3 (b), rather than tampering with it. 
On the fourth day Denness informed India he would be banning Tendulkar for one match, suspended for a year, for his actions. Ganguly was to be given a similar suspended punishment for not controlling his team - Wisden noted that considering he had been suspended and/or fined three times in the previous 12 months "he was fortunate to get away with only a suspended ban for not upholding the spirit of the game".
[Cricinfo]

No one in Australia is at least going 'oh Smith is a god and cannot have any blemishes'. Mike Denness was cast away from the ICC soon after, for no fault of his except doing his job. 

I am glad Smith and company are being penalised for the wrong doing. I wonder why the cricket world didn't wake up earlier to this malaise. While it's better late than never, it will take a culture change in various countries to root out ball tampering from cricket. 

Saturday, January 6, 2018

Ill Preparedness Ahead of South Africa

India is touring South Africa for three tests, six ODIs and three T20 internationals. This is the twenty fifth year and we are yet to win a test series in South Africa. Having toured the country so many times, you would think that we would have learnt a fair bit.

Never has an Indian team went to South Africa so unprepared. India has always had tour matches before the test matches. In the modern world of lots of cricket, teams even adopt a policy of less tour games. Alternatively, they prepare extensively at home in conditions tailormade for challenges they will face in foreign lands on artificial pitches with bowling machines and throw in. In addition to that, they tour nearby countries. England tours Bangladesh, for example, before coming to India to acclimitise. Even South Africa, the home country, played versus Zimbabwe as a means to get prepared for the matches ahead versus India.

India never felt the need for the same. For BCCI, matches versus Sri Lanka at home and away a million times a year makes more sense. Virat Kohli, the Indian test captain, pointed out that ideally they require a month to prepare for such a tour. Here, in Kohli's own words, in two days after the Sri Lankan tour ended, they were to fly to South Africa.

Is it a wonder then that India slumped to 92 runs for the lost of 7 wickets in 41.4 overs facing a real danger of being bowled out below 100 and before facing even 50 overs? Had it not been for Pandya's raw talent, India would have been in a terrible situation. Who do we blame? The cricketers for not having the time to adjust to the bouncier, more seaming wickets, or the BCCI, for not putting cricket first?

If India loses the first test, some how draws the second and goes on to win the third, would it not have been an opportunity missed to win the first series in South Africa in 25 years merely due to the lack of foresight of the people holding office at BCCI? Maybe some one can give a detailed explanation why the matches with Sri Lanka were very important financially. Why can't the BCCI, the richest board in all of cricket, put cricket first, just for a change?